Petitions, protests, legal threats and accusations of imposition have trailed the ongoing screening of aspirants by the ruling All Progressives Congress across several states ahead of the 2027 general elections, exposing widening cracks within the party over the use of consensus arrangements and the disqualification of aspirants.
Investigations showwd that aggrieved aspirants in states including Taraba, Kano, Jigawa, Anambra, Benue, Kogi, Kaduna, Ebonyi, Rivers, and Plateau are mobilising petitions and possible legal challenges over the outcome of the party’s screening exercise.
The screening exercise forms part of the APC’s nationwide process aimed at reducing the number of aspirants ahead of the party primaries. However, the exercise has already generated controversy in several states, with disqualified aspirants expected to seek redress through appeal committees.
In some states, protests have already erupted, while in others, party stakeholders warned that attempts to impose candidates could trigger defections, anti-party activities and deepen internal divisions ahead of the primaries.
In Taraba State, the endorsement of incumbent lawmakers, reportedly backed by party stakeholders after the screening exercise, sparked fierce backlash, particularly in Taraba North Senatorial District, where youth groups and stakeholders openly rejected the endorsement of Senator Shuaibu Isa Lau.
A stakeholder from Karim Lamido Local Government Area, Paul Penuel, described the senator’s tenure as “a complete failure,” insisting that there was “no record of impactful projects, no policy footprint, and nothing measurable” to justify another term.
Another constituent, Dickson Kwinde, warned that repeating what he called a “costly political mistake” could alienate voters.
“A mistake like this must never be repeated. The people of Taraba North cannot continue to be taken for granted,” he said.
Similarly, the Coalition of Concerned Youths and Voice of the Proletariat in Karim Lamido rejected the senator’s endorsement.
“We categorically state that we do not support Senator Shuaibu Isa Lau for any position. As far as we are concerned, he has nothing to show for his years in office and does not deserve another mandate,” the group stated through its convener, Godwin Karim.
Party sources disclosed that some aggrieved aspirants had begun preparing petitions against the screening outcome, alleging procedural irregularities, manipulation by political godfathers and attempts to impose consensus candidates without adequate consultation.
Some aspirants were also said to be considering protests and legal action if the appeal process failed to address their grievances.
Efforts are reportedly ongoing to reconcile the aggrieved members and prevent possible defections or anti-party activities ahead of the 2027 general elections.
In Kano State, no fewer than 20 aspirants seeking Senate, House of Representatives and State Assembly tickets were screened out despite earlier consensus arrangements.
Among those affected were former Head of Service, Usman Bala; former lawmaker, Sha’aban Sharada; Muhammad Zango; Danyaro Yakasai; Abbas Abbas; Shehu Driver and A.A. Zaura in the Kano Central Senatorial contest.
However, the state APC Publicity Secretary, Auwal Soja, confirmed that six aspirants in Kano Central eventually stepped down for former Governor Ibrahim Shekarau following a high-level reconciliation meeting.
“The six aspirants stepped down for Shekarau in the interest of unity and peace in Kano State,” he said.
Despite the arrangement, protests continued to trail the process. A group operating under the Coalition for Better Kano faulted the endorsement of Shekarau, arguing that loyalty and consistency should not be sacrificed for political expediency.
“The principles of political justice demand that loyalty must be rewarded. To bypass a foot soldier that stood firm for the party in favour of a newcomer, no matter how prominent, would send the wrong message,” the group said.
Efforts by Governor Abba Yusuf to reconcile aggrieved aspirants reportedly suffered setbacks after some stakeholders boycotted the reconciliation meeting convened to calm tensions.
Observers also expressed concern over the absence of key figures, including ALGON chairperson, Hajiya Sa’adatu Soja, and aggrieved aspirant, Salisu Yusha’u, warning that the development could weaken peace efforts within the party.
In Jigawa State, the fallout from the screening exercise resulted in resignation and defection.
Former Speaker of the Jigawa State House of Assembly, Isah Idris, resigned from the APC after he was disqualified and replaced by another aspirant.
In his resignation letter, Idris lamented what he described as the party’s departure from its founding principles.
“As a founding member and former Speaker, I had hoped that the APC would remain true to the principles on which it was established. However, I now believe it is time for me to move on,” he wrote.
The former speaker subsequently defected to the Peoples Democratic Party.
Another former speaker, Idris Garba, and serving lawmaker, Abubakar Sadiq, were also edged out during the exercise, heightening fears of deeper cracks within the state chapter.
Party insiders warned that failure to reconcile aggrieved stakeholders could destabilise the APC ahead of the primaries.
“You cannot push out key mobilisers and expect them to work for the same people that sidelined them,” a party insider warned.
In Benue State, about 40 aspirants were reportedly disqualified during the screening of House of Assembly hopefuls conducted in Makurdi.
The disqualifications have already generated discontent among supporters who accused the party of violating zoning arrangements and excluding certain blocs from representation.
A supporter of one of the affected aspirants, who identified himself simply as Amos, warned that the development could hurt the party electorally.
“It is our turn in Gboko to produce the state Assembly member because stakeholders had micro-zoned it to our area. People contributed money for the aspirant to purchase forms. If this is not corrected, it will be to the detriment of the party during the election,” he said.
In Kogi State, protests and accusations of authoritarianism followed allegations that nomination forms were selectively distributed to preferred aspirants under what critics described as a “Commando arrangement.”
A party chieftain, Chief Femi Olugbemi, accused the state leadership of abandoning democratic principles.
“Democracy within the APC in Kogi has been reduced to directives from above,” he alleged.
He further claimed that aspirants with strong grassroots support were deliberately excluded from the process.
“Forms that should be open to all qualified members are being shared selectively, and many of us with strong followings have been locked out,” he stated.
The controversy has fuelled fears of mass defections and legal disputes within the state chapter.
Similarly, in Anambra State, the APC expelled 30 members, including aspirants for Senate and House of Representatives seats, for instituting legal actions against the party.
The state Publicity Secretary, Valentine Iyiegbu, said the decision was taken in line with the party constitution.
“No fewer than 30 members of the APC in the state have been expelled following their litigations against the party,” he stated.
According to him, the only reprieve available to the expelled members would be the withdrawal of their court cases.
“It is only when the matters are withdrawn from the court that the party can consider listening to them,” he added.
In Kaduna State, although the House of Assembly screening reportedly ended without disqualification due to consensus arrangements brokered by party leaders, controversy erupted over moves to impose consensus candidates for National Assembly positions.
The crisis is particularly intense in Kaduna Central Senatorial District, where former lawmaker and activist, Shehu Sani, is reportedly being favoured as a consensus candidate.
The arrangement has been rejected by former Speaker Yusuf Zailani and activist Yarima Shettima.
“We strongly reject the so-called consensus arrangement in its entirety. Kaduna Central cannot be sacrificed on the altar of political manipulation and backroom deals,” Shettima declared.
Zailani’s camp also warned against imposing candidates on party members.
“Politics belongs to the people, not to one person alone. Just because someone is endorsed does not mean he has already won the election,” his Campaign Director, Musa Aliyu Khalid, stated.
The same scenario appears to be playing out in Ebonyi as disqualified candidates expressed dissatisfaction with the process.
An aspirant for the Ebonyi Central Senatorial District seat, Chief Christian Nwali, resigned in protest from the APC.
Nwali, an ally of the Minister of Works, David Umahi, was among the aspirants who lost out in the consensus arrangement adopted by the Ebonyi APC.
In a letter addressed to the state APC Chairman, Ekpelu Ward in Ikwo LGA, he stated that his resignation was “with immediate effect.”
“This serves as an official notice of my formal withdrawal from party activities and responsibilities,” the letter read in part.
In Rivers State, no fewer than 65 aspirants were disqualified by the Rivers State House of Assembly Screening Appeal Committee of the APC.
The panel confirmed that 33 aspirants were cleared during last weekend’s screening ahead of the party’s primaries.
Chairman of the panel and human rights lawyer, Dr Abdul Mahmud, disclosed this at a news briefing at the APC Secretariat in Port Harcourt on Tuesday.
Mahmud said both the number of cleared aspirants and those disqualified have been affirmed by various committees.
While noting that he is not a member of the APC, Mahmud disclosed that he is a private legal practitioner but that the leadership of the party chose him to head the screening appeal in the state because of the confidence reposed in him.
He disclosed that as of the time of the briefing, his appeal panel had received 19 petitions from aspirants, of which none had been treated. The panel chairman said the committee will continue sitting till Wednesday, 13th May.
He commended the aspirants who submitted petitions for their peaceful conduct and for turning out early before the panel arrived for its first sitting on Tuesday.
“We salute the appellants. They were already here when we came. It has been peaceful since we started. What we are doing is just straightforward. It is not a penalty shootout.
“Appellants have written to the chairman of the party, who has forwarded their petitions to us to consider. Some portions were received last night. The bulk of it was received this morning as soon as we came in.
“To my left, you’ll find the untreated petitions. We are calling each one after the other.”
He said the panel has also received the report of the screening committee on arrival.
“We have received a report from the screening panel. It’s a two-stage process. The screening panel met with them and scrutinised them.
“The report was also served on us because it also has to guide us on the infractions the aspirants may have committed that made the screening panel not clear them.
“Perhaps, some lessons can be drawn. I need to say it. But the bulk of the complaints that we have heard, not stated in their petitions, but in their oral presentations, were that the non-clearance decisions were not communicated to them.
“All of them pointed to the fact that they read their non-clearance on Facebook. Perhaps next time the party must learn from this experience,” Mahmud stated.
He advised the party, “When you clear and don’t clear aspirants, the people have telephone numbers. They should be able to send them text messages or WhatsApp messages that you have not been cleared for this reason.”
On the petitions, he said, “We have treated nine so far. Those cleared are 33, cleared by different committees, and 65 were not cleared. The report we have has a list of 98 aspirants. We have received 16 appeals so far. We have treated nine. The time of my limit ends on the 13th of May 2026. I will be here till 5 pm tomorrow.”
He disclosed that disqualified aspirants who appeared before the panel without documents were asked to bring such documents and present them before the panel.
“We need to see the document and sight the document. I’m not interested in your factions. It is your document I speak to,” he added, while warning disqualified aspirants against contacting him via text messages or any other means.
The APC in Plateau State is preparing for possible fallout from the screening of House of Assembly aspirants, following reports that several contenders were screened out ahead of the official release of results.
Party sources told The PUNCH in Jos on Tuesday that the screening committees had completed their assignment, although the national leadership of the party had yet to publish the outcome. The delay, insiders said, has heightened anxiety among aspirants and supporters, with growing fears that the exercise could deepen existing divisions within the state chapter.
When contacted, the Plateau APC chairman, Rufus Bature, declined to disclose the number of aspirants allegedly disqualified or comment on the mood within the party.
“What I can tell you for now is that we have screened all the aspirants, but the result of the screening committee is not yet out,” Bature said.
“We are still waiting for them to release the results. So, nobody will tell anything further until the result is made public. And sure, very soon, the committee will do that,” he added.
However, some aspirants told The PUNCH that they had been verbally informed of their disqualification without receiving any formal communication from the party. A number of them accused the screening panels of irregularities and lack of transparency, while others disclosed plans to file petitions challenging their exclusion.
Party insiders warned that the appeal process could reopen long-standing factional disagreements within the Plateau APC if grievances are not properly managed.
“The concern is that some of these aspirants have strong local structures and political influence. If they feel unfairly treated, it could create fresh tensions within the party,” a source familiar with the process said.
As of Tuesday evening, the national leadership of the APC had yet to release the consolidated list of cleared and disqualified aspirants for the state House of Assembly elections.
Meanwhile, the Imo State chapter of the APC said the list of cleared House of Assembly aspirants would be released on Wednesday (today).
The state APC Publicity Secretary, Dr Jones Onwuasoanya, disclosed this on Tuesday, explaining that the screening committee, chaired by Chief Judith Enanutor, screened a total of 106 aspirants at the party secretariat.
He denied knowledge of any disqualified aspirants, insisting that only the official publication would determine the final status of contestants.
“The list of qualified aspirants will be published. As of now, there is no list of qualified or disqualified aspirants. May 13 is the scheduled date for publication of names of qualified aspirants,” Onwuasoanya stated.
“The correct number of House of Assembly aspirants is 106,” he added.
He further reiterated that the screening committee had concluded its assignment and urged aspirants to wait for the official release of the list before concluding.
Amid the growing tensions, reconciliation efforts are ongoing in several states as party leaders move to prevent possible defections and anti-party activities.
While some states, such as Sokoto and Kebbi, recorded relatively calm exercises under consensus arrangements, political analysts warned that the wave of grievances emerging from many APC chapters could threaten party cohesion if not properly managed before the primaries.
According to analysts, the increasing resort to consensus candidacies, screening controversies and disqualifications has exposed the difficult balance between party control and internal democracy within the ruling party ahead of the 2027 elections.
In Abia State, the screening of House of Assembly aspirants commenced on Monday and was still ongoing as of Tuesday evening. The state Publicity Secretary of the APC, Uche Aguoru, said the process would be concluded on Tuesday, while acknowledging that disagreements may follow the release of the final list.
According to him, the party remained committed to constitutional provisions guiding direct primaries where consensus fails.
“Earlier, the party insisted that there would be no adoption or consensus aspirant unless parties to the position agree. In the event of disagreement even by one person, the constitutional provision of direct primaries will be used,” Aguoru stated.
In Gombe State, the APC also confirmed that the screening of House of Assembly aspirants was still ongoing.
The exercise, which is taking place at the APC Square in Gombe metropolis, attracted aspirants from the state’s 24 constituencies.
Speaking in a telephone interview with The PUNCH, party official Moses Kyari said the process had not been concluded.
“We are yet to conclude the process. I will personally confirm the number of those screened and disqualified, if there are any, tomorrow (Wednesday) when we complete it,” Kyari said.
The Zamfara state screening committee for the House of Assembly has sold 114 forms for the state assembly, which has just 22 seats.
Addressing journalists after the screening exercise, the state APC spokesperson, Alhaji Ibrahim Magaji, explained that only 105 out of 114 candidates who filled the forms have shown up for screening.
He said,” The screening commenced yesterday, Monday and will end on Wednesday. Those who are yet to show up can still come here from now to Wednesday this week, and if at the end of the exercise, they do not come, it means they are disqualified.”
An APC stalwart in the state, Dr Sani Shinkafi, said there would be a primary election if the consensus arrangement fails.
The Punch
