Nigerians’ demand for immediate action has risen as the Federal Government released an updated list of 48 individuals and 12 entities allegedly linked to terrorism financing in the country.
Simultaneously, security experts are warning that failure to follow through could further erode trust in Nigeria’s counterterrorism efforts.
Published on Saturday by the Nigeria Sanctions Committee, the list is one of the most comprehensive disclosures in recent times, targeting suspected financiers of violent groups operating across the country.
Among the prominent names on the list are Finland-based factional leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Simon Ekpa, and the publisher of Desert Herald, Tukur Mamu.
The list also include groups such as Boko Haram, the Islamic State West Africa Province, and IPOB, as well as entities like West and East Africa General Trading, Settings Bureau De Change Ltd, and the Lakurawa Sect.
The development comes at a time the government says it has secured convictions in 386 terrorism cases out of 508 prosecuted, even as attacks continue across several states, including Borno, Kebbi, Kwara, and Zamfara.
The names also published on the NiGSAC website include Abdulsamat Ohida, Mohammed Sani, Abdurrahaman Abdurrahaman, Fatima Ishaq, Yusuf Ghazali, Muhammad Sani, Abubakar Muhammad, and Sallamudeen Hassan.
Others are Adamu Ishaq, Hassana Isah, Abdulkareem Musa, Umar Abdullahi, Abdurrahaman Ado, Bashir Yusuf, Ibrahim Alhassan, Muhammad Isah, Salihu Adamu, Surajo Mohammad, Fannami Bukar, Muhammed Musa, Sahabi Ismail, Mohammed Buba, Adamu Hassan, Hassan Mohammed, Usman Abubakar, Kubara Salawu, Rabiu Suleiman, Godstime Iyare, Francis Mmaduabuchi, John Onwumere, Chikwuka Eze, Edwin Chukwuedo, Chiwendu Owoh, Ginika Orji, Awo Uchechukwu, Mercy Ali, Ohagwu Juliana, Eze Okpoto, Nwaobi Chimezie, and Ogumu Kewe.
Other entities named as terrorism sponsors include G.Side General Enterprises, Desert Exchange Ventures Limited, Eagle Square General Trading Co. Ltd, Alfa Exchange BDC, Alin Yar Yaya General Enterprises, K. Are Nigeria Limited, Suhailah Bashir General Enterprises, Igwe Ka Ala Enterprises, Seficuvi Global Company, Jama’atu Wal-Jihad, Ansarul Sudan, Islamic Province, Yan Group, and Yan Group NLBDG.
In 2024, the Federal Government similarly listed nine individuals and six organisations linked to terror financing, raising concerns over enforcement continuity.
Experts demand swift action
While analysts described the new list as a critical step forward, many insisted that naming suspects without decisive enforcement risks reducing the exercise to a symbolic gesture.
Security experts and retired senior law enforcement officers who spoke with Sunday Punch stressed that the next steps must be swift, coordinated, and transparent.
A retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Salami Abduraheem, said the credibility of the government’s action would be measured not by the publication of names but by tangible outcomes.
“Publishing a list is only the beginning. The real test is what happens next: arrests, prosecution, and convictions.
“If these individuals continue to move freely weeks or months after being named, it sends a dangerous signal that the system lacks the capacity or will to act,” he said.
Abduraheem noted that in previous instances, announcements of terror financing networks were not always followed by sustained legal action, raising concerns about enforcement gaps.
Similarly, a former director in a federal security agency, Abdullahi Adeoye, warned that suspects may attempt to evade capture once publicly identified.
“Time is critical in cases like this. Once names are out, suspects are alerted. If there is no immediate action, freezing accounts, restricting movement, and making arrests, you risk losing valuable intelligence,” he said.
Adeoye added that coordinated action involving financial regulators, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement bodies is essential to disrupt networks effectively.
Legal, institutional challenges
A security analyst, Musa Aliyu, described the move as long overdue but raised concerns about Nigeria’s capacity to prosecute high-level terror financiers.
“It shouldn’t just be about releasing the list alone. They have to go a long way and ensure that due diligence is done.
“Honestly speaking, the Nigerian legal system is not adequately prepared to prosecute terror sponsors effectively. This is evident in the weaknesses in criminal justice administration,” he said.
Aliyu also expressed concern about the judiciary’s ability to handle terrorism-related cases, urging the National Assembly to strengthen legal frameworks.
“The kind of judiciary we have right now is not wired to diligently prosecute the kind of criminal activities related to terrorism. This is the time for the National Assembly to provide the necessary tools to ensure adequate punishment,” he said.
Aliyu further stressed the need to balance transparency with due process.
“Justice must be seen to be done for victims, those killed, abducted, or forced to pay ransom. Nigerians must be assured that the fight against terrorism is not selective,” he added.
Public trust, accountability
For many Nigerians, the release of the list represents a rare moment of transparency in the fight against terrorism.
However, civil society groups say transparency must be matched with accountability.
A security governance expert, Shola Muse, expressed scepticism about the government’s commitment.
“It is not about releasing names. What is the judicial value? What is the executive value at the end of the day? If the government is sincere, it must convince the public that they are ready this time to act decisively. Otherwise, it becomes a media jamboree,” he said.
Muse called for synergy among the three arms of government and security agencies.
“There must be judicial support, executive will, and political backing. Without sincere and coordinated efforts, these measures may not achieve the desired results,” he added.
A security governance expert, Kemi Babatunde, said public confidence had been weakened by past experiences.
“Nigerians have seen lists before. What they want now is action, visible, measurable action. This is not just about security; it is about trust,” she said.
Babatunde emphasised the need for clear and consistent communication on progress.
Public reactions
Following the development, many Nigerians took to social media platforms, including Facebook and X, to demand immediate action from security agencies.
A user, Fyneface Dumnamene, wrote, “Go beyond listing and prosecute them if you have facts.”
Another user, Frank Okpara, urged the government to follow up with investigations and summons.
“The FG should proceed with legal action to bring them to justice immediately,” Salawu Enesi added.
A security expert, David Babawale, outlined key steps the government must take to ensure success, including the immediate freezing of financial assets linked to suspects, swift arrest and interrogation of individuals on the list, and strengthened collaboration between intelligence and law enforcement agencies.
“The government needs to ensure the assets of the named individuals are immediately frozen, followed by swift arrests and increased collaboration between security agencies, transparent communication with the public, and fast-tracked prosecution through designated courts,” he wrote.
Babawale noted that these measures are critical to dismantling terror financing networks and preventing further attacks.
Legal framework, prosecution hurdles
Nigeria’s legal framework, particularly the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, provides the basis for prosecuting individuals involved in terror financing.
A Senior Associate at Yusuf O. Ali & Co, Taofiq Olateju, said successful prosecution requires more than intelligence reports.
“You need admissible evidence that can stand in court: financial trails, witness testimony, digital records. These must be properly gathered and presented,” he said.
Olateju also highlighted delays in the judicial process, adding, “In Nigeria, cases can drag on for years. By the time you get to judgment, public interest has waned, and sometimes the evidence chain is compromised.”
A retired Commissioner of Police, Babatunde Salami, pointed to systemic challenges such as weak inter-agency coordination and political interference.
“You have intelligence agencies, the police, the military, and financial regulators working on different aspects. Without a unified command structure, efforts can conflict,” he said.
Salami warned that political considerations could complicate enforcement.
“The fight against terrorism financing must be insulated from politics. Once people suspect selective enforcement, public confidence collapses,” he said.
386 terrorists convicted
Meanwhile, on Thursday, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, disclosed that the government had secured hundreds of convictions in terrorism-related cases.
Speaking at the Federal High Court in Abuja, he said, “In total, we brought about 508 cases. Of these, we secured 386 convictions, eight discharges, two acquittals, and 112 adjournments.”
He added that the convictions should serve as a deterrent to others.
Despite these figures, experts insist that the effectiveness of Nigeria’s counterterrorism strategy will ultimately be judged by its ability to dismantle financing networks and ensure that those named are brought to justice.
The Punch
